THE IMPACT OF CULTURAL FACTORS OF ENTERPRENEURIAL PERFORMANCE


THE IMPACT OF CULTURAL FACTORS OF ENTREPRENEURIAL PERFORMANCE


CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION

1.1       BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY

Entrepreneurship practices exist in most countries of the world, including Nigeria. In Nigeria the development of entrepreneurship has gone a long way to achieve industrialization and economic development. Management scholars agree that although management theory and practices have universal applications, the individual and group with which it must interact, and the external environment differs in some way. It is acknowledged by management scholars also that there are many deviations in management theory all over the world. The attempt to discover the determinants of managerial success of entrepreneurs has always been a heartthrob among researchers of various fields of studies. Biographies of successful entrepreneurs and business men for instance reflected the tendency of the subject of such studies to explain their success in terms of virtue of handwork, thrift and clean living (Baridam 1995:15). As an alternative to biographical models are these studies that, turn the man who manipulates the omnipotent touch (gases 1983:20). Culture is dynamic in nature but cannot be change mechanically rather could be modified to suit a give environment. Almost every perception and behavior is guided by the human invention we call culture. Each culture shapes perception and behaviour by paving relative attention to some details of realities and ignoring others or by permitting some actions and forbidding others. Culture which forms parts of the complex education-sociological-cultural-political-legal-economic that interact and effect that performance of productive entrepreneur is often the less treated and less emphasized amongst these foregoing factors by business people (terpstra etal 1991:40); this notwithstanding the fact that it forms the bedrock on which the other factors operate.
Speculations dealing with the supposal effects of cultural factors of an environment on the performance of productive enterprises in that environment are on the rife.  However, empirical studies and a careful analysis of this situation in the context of entrepreneurship operating in developing countries remains to be exhaustively and satisfactorily treated. Though it can clearly be said that cultural factors have a substantial impact on managerial or entrepreneurial effectiveness and productivity measured in a given instance owing to the fact that sociological and cultural constraints are difficult to measure in quality.  This is always  a problem when one wishes to deal with human attitudes and value, it is often hard to distinguish popular misconceptions and myths from the realities of the situation (farmer etal 1965:60) so, it therefore becomes patient to test a number of significant and operational hypothesis in order to explain and predict production efficiency with a high degree of accuracy and confidence in any given case.
The issue of culture as it affects the performance of cultural factors affecting the performance of entrepreneur should take into consideration firstly, the salient cultural constrain that impinge upon the understanding and secondly, it should be established how these salient cultural constraints meet in one way or the other in the performance of firm. In addition socio-cultural variables also have impact on planning and control as well as the various production functions of these firms enterprises. Such as; research development, production marketing and finance. This study, will attempt to identify the various cultural factor that affect entrepreneurial operation in the understudied environment and also determine how these cultural factor affect the performance of entrepreneurs in the said environment.


1.2       STATEMENT OF PROBLEM
The fact that entrepreneurs contribute to the development of less development countries is irrefutable (freeman 1981:50). The issue that a nation culture and primary socializations produce several constraints which impinge upon the operation of productive entrepreneurs operating in developing countries like Nigeria ought to carryout in depth analysis on the socio-cultural factors inherent in the environment before they proceed with that venture. The form once it’s established is constrained by various factors inherent in the environment. Although all constraint areas (educational, socio-culture, political, legal, economic e.t.c) are come major difficulty that he in the social-cultural sector (farmer etal 1967:70). This case is very true , since the aspect of dealing with people oriented with strange custom and value usually present a problem.
The above issue is reflective of the Nigeria situation, experts have posited that cultural constraint are the bottom line when considering the issue of in efficiency and poor performance of enterprises in Nigeria.
This may not completely be true because whenever one is dealing human attitudes and value, it is often hand to distinguish popular misconception from the realities of the situation. These arises therefore, a need to determine (empirically) whether the cultural constraint in port Harcourt is significant enough to affect the performance of entrepreneurs operating therein.

1.3       PURPOSE OF STUDY
The general objectives of this study is to identify the impact of cultural factors on entrepreneurs and to what extent they affect them
1.                  To identify various cultural factors that initiate against the performance of entrepreneurs and to what extent they affect them
2.                  To identity the present effect of cultural factors of entrepreneurial performance
3.                  To examine entrepreneurs reaction towards cultural changes and therir coping strategies.
4.                  To examine other non-cultural factors and the extent to which they affect entrepreneurs.

1.4       RESEARCH QUESTIONS
The following research Question with the study.
1.                  To what extent does norms relate with entrepreneurs performance of some selected private firms in Port Harcourt?
2.                  To what extent does belief system relate with entrepreneurs performance of some selected private firms in Port Harcourt?
3.                  To what extent does attitude relate with entrepreneurs performance of some selected private firms in Port Harcourt?

1.5       RESEARCH HYPOTHESIS
The following research hypothesis will guide the study.
Ho 1. There is no significant relationship between norms and the productivity of some selected private firms in Port Harcourt.
Ho 2. There is no significant relationship between belief system and the productivity of some selected private firms in Port Harcourt.
Ho 3. There is no significant relationship between attitude and the productivity of some selected private firms in Port Harcourt.

1.6       SIGNIFICANT OF THE STUDY
This research study will be of great importance to the entrepreneurs instructiveness with the market and its customers. It will also be useful to the entrepreneur’s internal decision marketing process and will also influence the decision to create new business. This finding of the research will also create awareness of the norms, belief system and attitude of Nigerians to foreigners who desire to create business in Nigeria.

1.7       SCOPE OF THE STUDY
This study was concluded and limited to target population, geographical boundary study variable and unit of analysis. Form the above statement, the target population will focus on selected private firm in Port Harcourt.
The geographical boundary is Port Harcourt, the study variable will be divided into two: the independent variable represented as culture (having dimension as; Norms belief system and attitude) and the dependent variable represented as entrepreneurial performance (having measures as; productivity). The unit of analysis is at the organizational level.

1.8       DEFINITION OF TERMS
According to (Cosuala, 1985:80) definition of terms is the most important facet of the research report, since without a common understating of essential terms; the value of the research very be lost through misinterpretation. These level been defined however is back up this work.
Entrepreneurs: Schumpeter (1934), entrepreneurs are innovators who use a process of shattering the status quo of the existing products and service to set up a new product and services.

Entrepreneurship: According to Meredith etal (1991), entrepreneurship is the process of organizational and coordinating the factors of production and taking necessary decision to establish a business enterprise and keep it in with the pattern of demand and market value.

Business: Business is regarded as the process of creating, procuring or providing goods and services to customers or those who need them in proper quantities and qualities at suitable times and places at satisfactory process Nwaeke (2002).

Culture: Hofsted (1991) defined culture as the software of the mind and collective phenomena, shared with people who live in the same social environment.

Vales: As a board tendency to prefer certain stakes of affairs over others.

Business Environment: According to Jones etal (2002), they are these factors or forces that have potential effect on the way business operate.


Here is a complete chapter one of this project

Click here to get the full project

Email friendlyloadedprojects@gmail.com